I was talking earlier about raising taxes. I would like to note another reason why politicans aren't quick to raises taxes on the rich and that's because the highest tax bracket no longer just covers them. due to a mix of inflation and the fact that in 80's the number of tax bracket where lowered to simplefly them the top income bracket starts at the upper middle class.
Bill Gates is taxed as much as some as the family making $350,000 a year. That family maybe doing pretty well with that income they aren't doing nearly as well as Bill Gates and I don't think they should be taxed the same.
This is simple fixed by adding more tax brackets that cover a higher and higher income groups. The people making $350,000 well be taxed the same they are being taxed right now. Then the group above them a bit more and so on and so on.
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
higher taxes the thrid rail of politics that could power America's economy
Monday, November 29, 2010
economic tax plans and the road seldom taken
There have been a number of economic plans making the news recently. Some even bi-partisan and even though these plans are being hailed for taking ideals of both sides to make sure we don't face a deficate. But I notice that I have really seen anyone talk about raising taxes on the richest Americans. Yes they talk about ending tax cuts but the bushes tax cuts where set to end anyway. I'm talking about actually raising taxes on the richest americans well above what they paid before Bush (hell more then they payed before Reagon) in a move to raise revunue for America.
As I stated before taxes are currently at one of the the lowest rates they have ever been for the rich.
I know it's a third rail issue and politicans are afiard to touch it, not because it's a bad ideal but because no one really wants to pay taxes (though we like the benifits we get from paying taxes) and if you are going to aim a new tax hike on the rich you are taxing the people with loads of money. They are either the people that give the politicans the money they need to run or those with the power to raise a ruckus and mount a campiagn against the ideal.
But even though it's easy to see why a politican would back away from pushing the issue of higher taxes. It still stands that it is one of the most logical ways to make sure the United States is well founded.
Not only are you making sure we increase tax revune, if the tax is high enough it can act as an economic stimulus as people who currently are setting on large sums of money are forced to either use it (in things like highering people, giving to charities etc) or losing it in taxes.
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Are taxes really too high?
Often we see politicians talking about lowering taxes. Often they say that it will spur economic growth or they say we are paying high taxes. They say that as if right now we are paying some historically high tax rate.
But if you look at the history of the American tax rate it is clear that this is not true, if you look at the top tax rate. There have only been a few periods where taxes have been below where they are at right now (35%) on the top income earners. Those times where 1988-92, 1925-31 and 1916 to 1916.
Truth be told taxes have often been much higher. In fact if you look at America after WW II (a period of great economic expansion for this country) the richest Americans paid at least nearly twice what they do now. Normally taxes for people in the top income bracket was in the 70's to 80's percent but reached as high as 92% in 1952.
So while we have politicians pushing to make sure the rich keep tax cuts, there isn't much historic proof that keep taxes as low as they are now on the rich is actually a good thing.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Economic improvement For sale or lease
Driving around town (and surrounding areas) I've notice that a lot of retail buildings are up for sale or up to be leased.
It's similar to how I used to (ok still see) so many homes for sale and both are due to the down turn of the economy. But it seems like the housing market has already hit the bottom and is claiming up it seems like I am seeing more retail space up for sale.
Like the years before the crash of the housing market there was a boom of houses either being build or solid well over market value the same is true for retail commercial zoning. At least there was a lot of building of new retail buildings. For years I've notice new shopping centers pop up and tons of suburban/urban sprawl.
It seemed like a good thing at the time but I wonder did we see a little to much growth? Clearly some of these business have gone out of business because the economy is down but how many places are out of business because they where effected by the sprawl that may have over estimated the economy's growth in the first place.
An example I notice is that over the past few years a few new malls have opened up which has lead to the closing of the mall that has been in the area for decades. Since the new malls been built the old mall slowly started to die off until last year they closed down with sears being the only store in that mall opened.
I wonder how many of the buildings I see with a for sale sign are like that business are closed not just because of the bad economy but because business has been shifted to somewhere else or maybe we have one to many similar stores nearby and so business has been split between them but none of the stores got big enough of the pie to stay in business.
But even though it's economically troubling to see so many business out of business, I also have hope. The fact that there is so much commercial space out for sale means that business can buy propriety at low prices this is good for people looking to start their own business. The ground is ripe for new business to start up.
Also while I see so many for sale or lease signs up it seems a store in my neighborhood that's been closed since the late 80's/early 90's and before that it was closed since the 60's, has been bought and someone is working on that building. I assume that it was bought because the price was rock bottom low.
Of course people are going to have to be smart if they want success for both themselves and the economy. People are going to have to look at what is around them and build something different instead of going for the same types of stores. Maybe some of those buildings will have to be rezoned and turned to something else instead of retail space. Ie as we try to regrow are economy we will need to be smarter about the growth then we where before not fall into some of the same problems we are facing now.
But the space for economic development is for sale or lease all we have to do is buy it and build something.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
43.6 million American in poverity and counting
1 out of 7 Americans or 14.3% if Americans are living in poverty, as the recent census poll done in 2009 reveals.
That's something to think about as you hear politicians worry about tax cuts for the wealthy or talk about budget cuts on programs aimed at helping the poor.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Ronald Reagan head of the Office of Management and Budget talks about what really lead up to our current economic problems
This is a very interesting article where David Stockman Ronald Reagan's former head of the Office of Management and Budget.
Basically he is saying that the Republican party has had a big rule in it (though he doesn't say the Democrats are much better) and in fact it all started with Nixon getting us off the gold standard.
then he talks about the fact that the Republicans push for tax cuts but don't cut spending enough to match and in fact when looking at the military they are really the big spenders of government dollars.
Too much freedom and money has been giving to wall street.
and because of the lost of jobs and the growing wage gap Stockman thanks there maybe a class war in the United States where the poor (and middle class or what used to be the middle class) raise against the rich.
Hopefully things will get fixed before we need to get to that point, but I fear he may have a point about that.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Did the Bush whitehouse know about the dangers of the economy crisis, yet did nothing to stop it?
Well that's what Nancy Pelosi believes. She says that Bush knew yet didn't let the fed to tell congress about the predicted economic depression.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Black women on average have the lowest wealth in the nation
I just read this shocking article form the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette about the fact that the median wealth (ie how much money they have saved or investmented - things like credit card bills, mortgages, student loans and auto loans) of African-American women is really low.
And by low the average is about $5 for Black women ages 36 to 49.
Five dollars.
Why is that you may ask. Well the article brought up something I talk about a bit on this blog, that Black women where targeted in the subprime loan mess.
Another interesting thing they brought up is the fact that Black women actually give a lot of money away by doing things like helping family and giving to their church.